Relevant experience
Comparable problems, audiences, channels, and evidence of results.
Choosing an agency · Free private canvas
Compare shortlisted agencies against the same weighted criteria—and preserve the evidence behind the decision.
Step 1 · Set the decision
Use the same evidence standard for every candidate. Score independently before discussing the result as a group.
Step 2 · Compare the evidence
A rating without evidence is only an impression. Add one concrete observation before relying on the score.
Comparable problems, audiences, channels, and evidence of results.
Quality of diagnosis, trade-offs, and proposed direction.
The people doing the work, senior access, and specialist depth.
Process, capacity, timelines, dependencies, and risk management.
Useful success measures, reporting, and learning cadence.
Transparent scope, assumptions, fees, and change control.
Communication, challenge, chemistry, and operating compatibility.
Step 3 · Keep the decision record
The PDF is generated on this device. Names, scores, and notes are never uploaded.
Name and rate at least one agency to calculate a transparent weighted result.
The highest score is a discussion aid, not an automated hiring decision. Check references, team availability, conflicts, and contract terms separately.
Agency evaluation questions
Agree the criteria and weights before presentations, have evaluators score independently, and record concrete evidence beside every rating before discussing the result.
No. The result makes trade-offs visible, but references, conflicts, contract terms, team availability and unresolved evidence still require human review.
Yes. Agency names, ratings and evidence remain in the current browser tab. PDF generation happens locally on your device.